See post on HartKingLaw.com

Comic Con Sues Comic Con

Jul 30, 2015 | David Baker | Blog


If you were one of the 160,000 people lucky enough to score passes to San Diego Comic Con earlier this month, then you already understand the scope of the madness that engulfs the city and takes over the downtown Convention Center every July. Whether you go because you enjoy comic books, you hope to see your favorite actor previewing a new sci-fi movie, or you just like dressing up as a Star Wars Storm Trooper, you probably haven’t thought much about the San Diego Comic Con brand. Obviously derived from a combination of “comic” and “convention,” when these words are paired with the name San Diego they take on a whole new meaning. To millions of people, San Diego Comic Con, besides being a registered trademark (USPTO TM No. 1675405), is synonymous with all things nerd and geek.

So, it isn’t hard to imagine that when a competing convention featuring comic books held in a city other than San Diego starts using the term “Comic Con,” it upsets the folks at San Diego Comic Con.

In a move some consider controversial, San Diego Comic-Con has filed suit against one such competitor, Salt Lake Comic Con, alleging trademark infringement and seeking to force the competing convention to call itself something other than “Comic-Con.” While Salt Lake Comic Con is only a few years old, it has grown in size considerably over the last few years, whereas San Diego Comic Con is a non-profit organization that has been running its convention for almost 45 years. Nevertheless, Salt Lake Comic successfully obtained an active use federal registration for its trademark in mid-July of this year.

Under U.S. trademark law, a business that uses a trademark has the exclusive right to continue using that trademark and to stop other persons or entities from using an identical mark or a potentially confusing similar mark. Additionally, an argument can be made that the owner of a trademark has an affirmative obligation to stop others from infringing on the mark in order to enhance its primary function as a source identifier for goods and services. After all, trademark laws are intended to protect consumers, not the companies that own the trademarks.

Generally speaking, U.S. trademark law also recognizes that priority of usage is a key factor in determining whether or not a trademark can be enforced against a competing use. In the San Diego versus Salt Lake City dispute, San Diego holds the upper hand in terms of earlier use. However, an analysis of trademark infringement usually includes a geographic component. If two trademarks are competing in different markets, a reviewing court will not necessarily rule that the latter mark is infringing and therefore cannot be used at all. In fact, it is not uncommon for such marks to be allowed to co-exist, albeit with restrictions on the expansion of their use into directly competing areas.

San Diego Comic Con is wildly profitable for the city and for the on-site vendors, generating hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue every year. And with popularity and profitability, it is inevitable that competition will arise. Comic book and popular media conventions are now held in cities throughout North America (many are even held in Europe and the Middle East) and the thing that unites them all is the desire to mimic San Diego Comic Con and to use the Comic Con name. The problem for San Diego Comic Con is that the proliferation of such conventions comes at the risk of misleading attendees of the other convention into believing that there is some affiliation between them and San Diego Comic Con. There is not. And, San Diego Comic Con must protect its valuable trademark or run the risk of losing it.

Why it matters.

Read the remaining story and "Why it matters" :

See post on HartKingLaw.com